Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Chandrashekhar Vishnu Paranjape (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Chandrashekhar Vishnu Paranjape (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) FMV as on 01.04.1981 Cannot Be Replaced by Stamp Rates Without DVO Reference: ITAT Pune Remands Capital Gains Issue The Pune Bench of the ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee (HUF) for AY 2015-16 for statistical purposes and set aside the determination of long-term capital gains on the ground that the Assessing Officer rejected the registered valuer’s report without referring the matter to the Departmental Valuation Officer (DVO). In the instant case, the assessee had adopted the fair market value (FMV) of land as on 01.04.1981 at â...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031