Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Chandrashekhar Vishnu Paranjape (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Chandrashekhar Vishnu Paranjape (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) FMV as on 01.04.1981 Cannot Be Replaced by Stamp Rates Without DVO Reference: ITAT Pune Remands Capital Gains Issue The Pune Bench of the ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee (HUF) for AY 2015-16 for statistical purposes and set aside the determination of long-term capital gains on the ground that the Assessing Officer rejected the registered valuer’s report without referring the matter to the Departmental Valuation Officer (DVO). In the instant case, the assessee had adopted the fair market value (FMV) of land as on 01.04.1981 at â...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SCN u/s 74 GST Valid even if based on Material from allegedly Illegal Search or from another Commissionerate-Karnataka HC Sec 13(1)(c) Not Attracted for Higher Profit to Related Concerns: HC Karnataka HC Quashes TDS Refund on Land Acquisition Over Suppression; ₹5L Cost Assessment Order Passed in Name of Deceased Assessee Held Void – Karnataka HC LTCG Cannot Be Taxed in Wife’s Hands When Property Settled by Husband – ITAT Deletes Rs. 19.86 Cr Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031