Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sushil Mitruka Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sushil Mitruka Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) Borrowed Satisfaction Backfires — Reopening Quashed; Cash Deposits Explained, Revenue Appeal Crumbles Kolkata ITAT delivered a sweeping relief to Sushil Mitruka for AYs 2014-15 to 2017-18, holding that the very foundation of reassessment was illegal. The Tribunal found that reopening u/s 147 was based purely on borrowed satisfaction from DDIT (Investigation), with the AO mechanically reproducing the investigation report without any independent application of mind or formation of his own “reason to believe”. Such reopening, the Tribunal held, is imper...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Approval from PCIT Instead of PCCIT Renders Section 148 Notice Invalid View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930