Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M. Shashikant & Co Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
M. Shashikant & Co Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Paper Trail, Stock Tally and Exports Trump Suspicion: ITAT Deletes Bogus Purchase Addition in Diamond Trade The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee’s appeal and deleted the addition of ₹59.11 lakh made on account of alleged bogus purchases, holding that mere third-party information cannot override cogent documentary evidence and quantitative reconciliation. The assessee, engaged in trading and export of cut and polished diamonds, had reopened assessment based on Investigation Wing inputs relating to alleged acco...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Additions Fail: Documentary Evidence Cannot Be Ignored Without Enquiry Commission Disallowance Remanded – 133(6) Non-Response Not Sufficient; Ad-hoc Expenses Cut to 10% Stamp Duty vs Actual Value Dispute: ITAT Orders DVO Valuation ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930