Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Arun Engineering Udyog Private Limited (TAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Arun Engineering Udyog Private Limited (TAT Kolkata) Unsecured Loans Repaid with Interest Can’t Be Branded Bogus: ITAT Kolkata Upholds Deletion of ₹46 Lakh u/s 68 Kolkata ITAT ‘A’ Bench dismissed the Revenue’s appeal for AY 2022-23 and upheld the deletion of addition of ₹46 lakh made u/s 68 towards alleged bogus unsecured loans. Tribunal noted that the assessee had furnished complete evidences before the AO establishing identity, creditworthiness & genuineness of loan creditors, and the AO himself recorded a finding that the loans were subsequently repaid along with int...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031