Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mohd. Saleem Rather Vs ITO (ITAT Amritsar)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Mohd. Saleem Rather Vs ITO (ITAT Amritsar)

The ITAT, Amritsar Bench held that once business activity is accepted, bank deposits cannot be artificially bifurcated into business credits & unexplained cash, merely because part of deposits were made during demonetisation period.

In this case, the assessee, a wholesale trader of mobile phonesPlease become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Bank Deposits Treated as Business Receipts – ITAT Upholds Deletion of ₹1.71 Cr Addition u/s 69A Reassessment Quashed – Notice U/s 148 Held Time-Barred & Ante-Dated ITAT Chennai: No Addition U/s 56(2)(vii) Where Valuation Difference Within 10% Tolerance Band Penalty U/s 270A Deleted – AO Failed to Specify Misreporting Clause ITAT Chennai: Registration u/s 12AB & 80G Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Trust Has Not Yet Started Activities View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031