Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : PramodarayNaranaprasad Pathak Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-2021
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
PramodarayNaranaprasad Pathak Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Ahmedabad ITAT Deletes Section 69A Addition on Cash Deposits; Accepts Cash Savings and Bank Withdrawals as Explained Source The Ahmedabad ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal and deleted the addition of ₹5,00,100 made under section 69A, holding that the cash deposited in the post office account stood satisfactorily explained through cash savings from earlier years and withdrawals from bank accounts. The assessee, who earned his livelihood through priesthood and catering, had not filed a return of income for AY 2020-21 as his total inc...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Entire Books Cannot Be Rejected for One Unproved Expense: ITAT Ahmedabad Section 10(10B) Exemption Allowed on BSNL VRS Compensation: ITAT Ahmedabad On-Money Addition Restricted to Co-owner’s Investment Share: ITAT Ahmedabad Section 54B: Time to Revisit Rural Agricultural Land Withdrawal Rules Section 80P(2)(d) Deduction Allowed on Interest from Co-operative Bank Deposits: ITAT Pune View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031