Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Shroff Krishnarajasetty Satheesha (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax Vs Shroff Krishnarajasetty Satheesha (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT Bangalore held that addition under section 69B of the Income Tax Act for unexplained investment solely on the basis of the document that didn’t contained name of the assessee is unsustainable as the same is outside the purview of definition of section 153C(1)(a) & (b). Facts- A search action u/s 132 of the Act was conducted in the case of M/s. C. P. Exports. During the course of search proceedings some documents were found and seized related to the purchase of property by the assessee from Sr....
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930