Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Narendra Vinayak Palmure Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Narendra Vinayak Palmure Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) No Addition on Reopening Issue, No Addition on Any Other Issue: Bangalore ITAT Quashes Reassessment Reassessment Fails When Recorded Reason Yields No Addition The Bangalore ITAT held that where an assessment is reopened under section 147 for a specific reason, but no addition is ultimately made on that very issue, the Assessing Officer cannot sustain any addition on a different issue discovered during the reassessment proceedings. Accordingly, the Tribunal deleted the addition made by disallowing the assessee’s claim under section 54, since th...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Gross Profit Cannot Be Estimated Without Rejecting Books: Bangalore ITAT Section 148 Notice Quashed for Lack of Section 151(ii) Approval: Hyderabad ITAT Wrong Mention of Section 69 Instead of 69A Does Not Invalidate Addition: ITAT Hyderabad Gift from Mother Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Investment: ITAT Hyderabad Temporary Cash Support for Student Visa Is Not a Loan Under Section 269SS: ITAT Chennai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031