Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dnyaneshwar Ekanath Balwadkar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dnyaneshwar Ekanath Balwadkar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) 193-Day Delay Condoned- Agriculturist Not Tech-Savvy: Tribunal Says ‘Don’t Throw Out Appeal on Technicality’ Assessee, an individual agriculturist, had not filed ROI for AY 2018-19. Based on financial transactions of ₹2,00,22,000, reassessment was initiated u/s 147 & completed ex-parte u/s 147 r.w.s.144 determining income at ₹5,74,28,150 as Assessee failed to respond to 148 notice & follow-up notices. Before CIT(A)/NFAC, appeal was filed with a delay of 193 days. CIT(A) refused to condone the delay & dismissed the appeal in...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031