Sponsored
    Follow Us:
Sponsored

Kerala State Goods and Services Tax (SGST) department has issued Circular No. 12/2024-Kerala SGST to clarify the method for calculating penalties under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) Act, 2017, specifically in cases where notices are issued under Sections 73(1) and 74(1) of the Kerala Goods and Services Tax (KSGST) Act. The circular addresses the need for uniformity in penalty imposition, as the IGST Act’s penalty quantification relies on provisions from the Central and State GST Acts. According to Section 20 of the IGST Act, the penalty should be the sum of penalties under both the Central GST (CGST) and State GST (SGST) Acts. The circular provides examples to illustrate this calculation: penalties should not be added together but rather assessed as the total penalty amount under the combined CGST and SGST Acts. For instance, if the penalty under both CGST and SGST is ten percent of the tax amount, then under the IGST Act, it is ten percent of the combined tax amounts under CGST and SGST. The circular ensures clarity and uniform application of penalty calculations across field formations.

Office of the Commissioner of the State Goods and Services Tax
Department, Tax Towers, Karamana, Thiruvananthapuram
SGST Policy Division
E-mail: [email protected]
Ph: 0471-2785276

No. SGST/5310/2024-PLC6

Circular No.12/2024-Kerala SGST | Date:13-08-2024

Sub: – Manner of penalty calculation under IGST Act, 2017 for the show cause notices issued under section 73(1)/74(1) of the KSGST Act, 2017 read with section 20 of the IGST Act, 2017 – clarifications issued – reg.

1. It has come to the notice that field formations require clarity in the computation and imposition of penalty under the fourth proviso of Section 20 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) Act, 2017 in cases where tax is being demanded under Section 73(1)/74(1) of the Kerala Goods and Services Tax (KSGST) Act, 2017.

2. In order to ensure uniformity in the implementation of the provisions of law across the field formations, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 168 (1) of the Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “KSGST Act”), clarifies the issues as under:

3. Section 73 of the KSGST Act, 2017 provides for the determination of tax not paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilized for any reason other than fraud or any willful-misstatement or suppression of facts.

4. Section 73(9) of the KSGST Act, 2017 reads as follows: “The proper officer shall, after considering the representation, if any, made by person chargeable with tax, determine the amount of tax, interest and a penalty equivalent to ten per cent of tax or ten thousand rupees, whichever is higher, due from such person and issue an order.”

5. Section 74 of the KSGST Act, 2017 provides for the determination of tax not paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilized by reason of fraud or any willful-misstatement or suppression of facts.

6. Section 74(1) of the KSGST Act, 2017 reads as follows:

“(1) Where it appears to the proper officer that any tax has not been paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or where input tax credit has been wrongly availed or utilised by reason of fraud, or any wilful-misstatement or suppression of facts to evade tax, he shall serve notice on the person chargeable with tax which has not been so paid or which has been so short paid or to whom the refund has erroneously been made, or who has wrongly availed or utilised input tax credit, requiring him to show cause as to why he should not pay the amount specified in the notice along with interest payable thereon under section 50 and a penalty equivalent to the tax specified in the notice

7. Section 20(xxv) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 reads as follows: “Subject to the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder, the provisions of Central Goods and Services Tax Act relating to,––(i) scope of supply; (ii) composite supply and mixed supply; (iii) time and value of supply; (iv) input tax credit;……….. (xvi) demands and recovery;… (xxi) offences and penalties;……… (xxv) miscellaneous provisions including the provisions relating to the imposition of interest and penalty, shall, mutatis mutandis, apply, so far as may be, in relation to integrated tax as they apply in relation to central tax as if they are enacted under this Act:

8. The 4th proviso of section 20 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 says that “in cases where the penalty is leviable under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act and the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act, the penalty leviable under this Act shall be the sum total of the said penalties.”

9. In terms of 4th proviso to Section 20 of the IGST Act, the amount of penalty to be quantified/levied is the sum total of the amount of penalty “leviable” under the CGST Act plus the SGST Act. As such, there is no independent provision of its own under the IGST Act to quantify the amount of penalty; it arrives at such quantification through the provisions of the CGST and the SGST Acts.

10. In this scenario, what emerges is that the quantum of penalty under the IGST Act is entirely dependent upon the penalty “leviable” under the CGST and the SGST Acts.

11. As per 4th proviso of Section 20 of IGST Act, the penalty leviable under the IGST Act would be the sum total of the quantum of penalty to be levied under the CGST Act and the SGST Act. This is clarified with an Illustration worked out as under:

12. Illustration: For a service attracting 18% rate of tax, the tax levied under CGST is at the rate of 9% and that under SGST is at the rate of 9%. If it becomes an intra-state supply, the penalty to be levied on each Act is 10% as per section 73(9) of the CGST and the SGST Acts. (i.e., Taxable value x 9% x 10%). Now, applying these rates to the above clause of the IGST Act-

  • Provided also that in cases where the penalty is leviable under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act (i.e., Taxable value x 9% x 10%) or the State Goods and Services Tax Act (i.e., Taxable value x 9% x 10%), the penalty leviable under this Act shall be the sum total of the said penalties ((Taxable value x 9% x 10%) + (Taxable value x 9% x 10%))
  • Therefore, the penalty is (CGST (Taxable value x 9% x 10%) + SGST (Taxable value x 9% x 10%)), which is equal to 10% of (9% + 9%), i.e., which is equal to 10% of 18%.
  • In short, the ‘penalty’ is ten per cent of tax amount under IGST Act. Therefore, as per section 20 of IGST Act, it is the penalty amounts that must be added, (The penalty rates should NOT be added.)

13. The above scenario can be explained with the following examples (assume the tax rate is 18%):

Example 1: An adjudicating authority has decided to confirm a demand under section 73 of the Act for the non-payment of the following taxes:

Inv.
No.
Inv. Date Tax
Period
Taxable
Value
IGST CGST SGST
IG031 10.06.2019 June 2019 2,00,000 36,000
CS046 21.07.2019 July 2019 10,00,000 90,000 90,000
CS082 12.10.2019 Oct. 2019 15,00,000 1,35,000 1,35,000
Total 27,00,000 36,000 2,25,000 2,25,000

The adjudicating authority should impose the penalty under the IGST Act in the following manner:

Description Calculation Penalty amount (Rs.)
Penalty leviable under the CGST & the SGST Acts are 10% or 10,000/- each whichever is higher. CGST=25,00,000 x 9% x 10% (or) 10,000 whichever is higher SGST = 25,00,000 x 9% x22,500/- 0% (or) 10,000 whichever is higher 22,500/- (CGST) & (SGST)
Penalty leviable under IGST Act (as per 4th proviso of section 20 of the IGST Act) CGST = 2,00,000 x 9% x 10% (or) 10,000 whichever is higher + SGST = 2,00,000 x 9% x+10,000) 10% (or) 10,000 whichever is higher 3,600 (1,800+1,800) or 20,000 (10,000 whichever is higher. H e r e it is Rs. 20,000/-

Example 2: An adjudicating authority has decided to confirm a demand under section 73 of the Act for the following items of ineligible ITC utilized by a taxable person.

Inv.
No.
Inv. Date Tax
Period
Taxable
Value
IGST CGST SGST
H3744 14.04.2020 Apr. 2020 72,00,000 12,96,000
P4180 08.08.2020 Aug. 2020 1,00,00,000 18,00,000
Total 1,72,00,000 30,96,000

The adjudicating authority should impose the penalty under the IGST Act in the following manner;

Description Calculation Penalty amount (Rs.)
 

 

Penalty leviable under IGST Act (as applicable in CGST Act)

 

 

1,72,00,000 x 9% x 10%Here, (or) 10,000 whichever is higher

+

1,72,00,000 x 9% x 10%whichever (or) 10,000 whichever is higher

the penalty to be imposed is Rs. 3,09,600/- (1,54,800 + 1,54,800)

or

20000 (10,000+10,000) is higher and not ‘0’ (as there is no demand in CGST & SGST))

Example 3: An adjudicating authority has decided to confirm a demand under section 73 of the Act for the following taxes not paid by a taxable person.

Inv.
No.
Inv. Date Place of
Supply
Taxable
Value
IGST CGST SGST
G123 14.04.2020 Delhi 15,00,000 2,70,000
G252 08.05.2020 Karnataka 24,00,000 4,32,000
G300 10.06.2020 Tamil Nadu 35,00,000 6,30,000
G567 13.07.2020 Odisha 10,00,000 1,80,000
G1012 12.11.2020 Kerala 10,00,000 0 90,000 90,000
Total 94,00,000 15,12,000 90,000 90,000

Here, the Place of Supply extends across multiple states. Here the penalty levied cannot be apportioned among all the states involved, nor can it be exclusively credited to any particular state. In such a situation, all the recipient states have suffered tax loss in these transactions and are entitled to receive the penalty as per the place of supply provisions of the Act. Therefore, the calculation of penalty under IGST Act shall be made in the following manner:

Description Destination Calculation Penalty amount (Rs.)
Penalty leviable

under IGST Act

Delhi 15,00,000 x 9% x 10% (or) 10,000 whichever is higher

+

15,00,000 x 9% x 10% (or) 10,000 whichever is higher

IGST – 27,000/- 13,500+13,500 (or) 10,000+10,000 whichever is higher
Karnataka 24,00,000 x 9% x 10%IGST (or) 10,000 whichever is higher

+

24,00,000 x 9% x 10%
(or) 10,000 whichever is higher

– 43,200/- 21,600+21,600 (or) 10,000+10,000 whichever is higher
Tamilnadu 35,00,000 x 9% x 10% (or) 10,000 whichever is higher

+

35,00,000 x 9% x 10%
(or) 10,000 whichever is higher

IGST – 63,000/- 31,500+31,500 (or) 10,000+10,000 whichever is higher
Odisha 10,00,000 x 9% x 10% IGST (or) 10,000 whichever is higher

+

10,00,000 x 9% x 10%
(or) 10,000 whichever is higher

Rs. 20,000/- 9,000+9,000 (or) 10,000+10,000 whichever is higher
 

The penalty is to be levied under the CGST & the SGST Act and it is calculated at the rate of 10% or 10,000/- each, whichever is higher.

Kerala Kerala (CGST + SGST) 1000000 x 9% x 10% 10,00,000 x 9% x 10% (or) 10,000 whichever is higher and

10,00,000 x 9% x 10% (or) 10,000 whichever is higher

CGST CGST –
10,000/-
& SGST – 10,000/-
The total penalty under IGST is = 27000 + 43200 + 63000 + 20000 = Rs. 1,53,200/– and not Rs. 1,51,200/- (10% of IGST total tax liability).

Difficulty, if any, in the implementation of the above instructions may please be brought to the notice of the undersigned.

ABRAHAM RENN S IRS
Commissioner

To,
All Concerned

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930