Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Goods and Services Tax

Illness and Hidden Portal Notice Void GST Order: Delhi HC

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 8952
Case Name
Ruchika Industries Through Its Proprietor Rakesh Kumar Dhingra Vs Union of India And Ors (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number
Premium Access
Date of Judgement/Order
Premium Access
Subscribe to download.

Already Upgraded? Log in.

Advertisement

Ruchika Industries Through Its Proprietor Rakesh Kumar Dhingra Vs Union of India And Ors (Delhi High Court)

The Delhi High Court has set aside an adverse tax order issued against Ruchika Industries under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, ruling that a combination of the show-cause notice (SCN) being uploaded to an obscure tab on the GST portal and the proprietor’s serious medical condition violated the principles of natural justice.

The judgment, in the case of Ruchika Industries Through Its Proprietor Rakesh Kumar Dhingra Vs Union of India And Ors, emphasizes the court’s priority in ensuring a fair opportunity to be heard, especially when a taxpayer presents genuine and compelling reasons for non-compliance.

Facts of the Case: Dual Reasons for Non-Response

Proprietor Rakesh Kumar Dhingra, representing Ruchika Industries, filed a writ petition challenging the adverse order dated August 24, 2024, arguing that he missed the opportunity to reply to the SCN dated May 29, 2024, for two primary reasons:

1. Obscure Portal Tab: The SCN was initially uploaded by the department to the “Additional Notices Tab” on the GST portal. This non-standard location meant the notice did not immediately come to the petitioner’s attention.

2. Medical Hardship: During the relevant period in 2023 and 2024, the proprietor was facing serious medical issues, including multiple hospitalizations, which, compounded by related stress, caused him to miss the opportunity to file a reply even after the notice may have become visible.

Despite the department issuing a reminder notice on July 15, 2024, no reply was filed, leading the Sales Tax Officer to pass the final demand order ex-parte (without hearing the taxpayer). The department argued that the petitioner’s continued filing of regular returns through this period negated the claim of missing the SCN.

Want to Read the Complete Judgment?

You have read the free case summary. Unlock the full judgment, the detailed judicial reasoning and the downloadable PDF, along with every other premium judgment on TaxGuru.

Read on with Premium
Goes straight to payment. GST invoice included.

One subscription covers the entire premium judgment library, not just this case.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: Graduate, CA in Job / Business, DD
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 24,183

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.