Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Goods and Services Tax

GST Order Quashed for Denial of Personal Hearing: Calcutta HC

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2026 taxguru.in 13962
Case Name
Arup Dutta Vs State of West Bengal & Ors. (Calcutta High Court)
Appeal Number
Premium Access
Date of Judgement/Order
Premium Access
Subscribe to download.

Already Upgraded? Log in.

Advertisement

Arup Dutta Vs State of West Bengal & Ors. (Calcutta High Court)

Summary: The Calcutta High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Arup Dutta challenging the legality and validity of an adjudication order dated 09.12.2025 passed by respondent No. 3 under Section 73 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner submitted that a show cause notice in Form DRC 01 dated 04.06.2025 had demanded tax, interest and penalty and that the notice and adjudication order were uploaded on the GST portal under the tab “Additional Notice and Orders”. According to the petitioner, the personal hearing date in the show cause notice was fixed prior to the reply date, and despite a reply being submitted on 04.01.2025, respondent No. 3 did not provide an opportunity of personal hearing, contrary to Section 75(4) of the GST Act.

The petitioner further stated that the ex-parte adjudication order was uploaded under the “Additional notices and order” tab and that he came to know about the order dated 09.12.2025 only after receiving a phone call from the GST Department on 10.07.2026. The State opposed the writ petition and submitted that ample opportunities had been granted to defend the case. Upon hearing the parties and perusing the records, the Court observed that the petitioner had made out a prima facie case and noted that the adjudication order had only been uploaded under the “Additional Notice and Orders” tab without separate intimation. The Court consequently quashed and set aside the adjudication order dated 09.12.2025 and directed respondent No. 3 to revisit the issue by considering the petitioner’s reply on merits, afford an opportunity of hearing and pass a fresh reasoned adjudication order in accordance with law within 12 weeks. The decision was directed to be communicated within a week thereafter. The Court clarified that since no affidavit in opposition had been called for, the allegations in the writ petition were deemed to have been denied and not admitted.

Want to Read the Complete Judgment?

You have read the free case summary. Unlock the full judgment, the detailed judicial reasoning and the downloadable PDF, along with every other premium judgment on TaxGuru.

Read on with Premium
Goes straight to payment. GST invoice included.

One subscription covers the entire premium judgment library, not just this case.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: Graduate, CA in Job / Business, DD
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 24,183

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.