Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Goods and Services Tax

GST Matter Remanded as SCN Uploaded in Additional Tab Was Not Noticed

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 11148
Case Name
Ess Dee Industries Vs Commissioner of DGST & Ors (Delhi High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement

Ess Dee Industries Vs Commissioner of DGST & Ors (Delhi High Court)

The petitioner challenged a Show Cause Notice dated 11 December 2023 for FY 2018–2019 and the consequential order dated 10 March 2024. The petitioner also contested two notifications—Notification No. 9/2023 (Central Tax) and Notification No. 09/2023 (State Tax)—which were already under challenge in a batch of petitions led by another matter. In that batch, the Court had heard submissions questioning whether proper procedure under Section 168A of the CGST Act was followed before issuing the notifications. Different High Courts had taken differing views regarding the validity of related notifications, and the issue was pending before the Supreme Court in an SLP, where notice had been issued.

Several High Courts, including Punjab & Haryana, refrained from ruling on the validity of the notifications and disposed of petitions subject to the Supreme Court’s final decision. The Delhi High Court observed that, since the broader challenge to the notifications was already before the Supreme Court, any challenge in the present petition would also remain subject to its outcome.

The petitioner argued that the SCN was uploaded only under the “Additional Notices” tab on the GST portal, which prevented the petitioner from becoming aware of it and filing a reply. A reminder was also issued, but no reply was filed. The adjudication order was passed without the petitioner’s participation, and the petitioner claimed to have learned of the proceedings only when a subsequent notice was issued in September 2025. Citing a prior judgment where similar issues arose due to SCNs placed under the “Additional Notices” tab, the Court noted that the petitioner had not been given a fair opportunity to respond.

Paid content

Become a Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 20,886

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.