Introduction:
In a significant ruling, the High Court of Judicature at Madras has directed the Assistant Commissioner (ST) to refund the recovered amounts to Tvl.Cargotec India Private Limited. The petitioner had filed a Writ Petition seeking recredit or refund of the amounts recovered pursuant to assessment orders for the assessment years 2017-2018, 2018-2019, and 2019-2020. The court’s decision highlights the importance of adhering to the prescribed timelines for recovery proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Background:
The petitioner, Tvl.Cargotec India Private Limited, represented by its Authorized Signatory Jagabandhu Ganguly, approached the court seeking a direction for the recredit or refund of the amounts recovered by the GST authorities. The petitioner argued that recovery proceedings were initiated prematurely, even before the expiry of the three-month limitation period for filing an appeal before the first appellate authority.
Legal Provisions:
The court examined Section 78 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, which governs the initiation of recovery proceedings. According to this provision, any amount payable by a taxable person in pursuance of an order passed under the Act must be paid within three months from the date of service of such order. Failure to make the payment within the prescribed period empowers the authorities to initiate recovery proceedings.
The proviso to Section 78 allows the proper officer to require the taxable person to make payment within a period less than three months, provided it is expedient in the interest of revenue. However, the proviso can only be invoked if the proper officer records in writing the reasons justifying the early payment requirement.
Court’s Decision:
The court observed that the respondents failed to provide any material justifying the invocation of the proviso to Section 78. As a result, the court held that the petitioner is entitled to a refund of the recovered amounts.
The High Court, in its order, directed the first respondent, the Assistant Commissioner (ST), to either refund the recovered amount or recredit the same to the petitioner’s Electronic Cash or Credit Ledgers within one month from the date of receipt of the order.
Implications:
This judgment sets a precedent for cases where recovery proceedings are initiated prematurely by the GST authorities. It emphasizes the importance of adhering to the prescribed timelines and the need for proper justification when invoking the proviso to Section 78.
Conclusion:
The High Court’s decision in the case of Tvl.Cargotec India Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner (ST) highlights the significance of following the statutory provisions governing recovery proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The ruling ensures that taxpayers are not subjected to undue hardship and provides clarity on the timelines for recovery actions. This judgment will serve as a guiding principle for future cases involving premature recovery of GST amounts.
Author Bio
ALL INFORMATION RELATED GST AND INCOME TAX Of CA PRATEEK MITRUKA IS VERY USEFULL FOR ME..