Exercising writ jurisdiction inconsistent with legislative intent would render legislative scheme and intention otiose

Assistant Commissioner (CT) LTU Vs Glaxo Smith Kline Consumer Health Care Limited (Supreme Court)

In Challenge : – Judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and State of Andhra Pradesh.

Constitution of India – Art-226 – Writ Jurisdiction bypassing the statutory provisions – remedy against the assessment order stood foreclosed by Limitation Law – Section 31 AP VAT Act 2005 – appeal against order

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.