Sponsored
    Follow Us:
Sponsored

Mr. Satodiya Extractor Purchased a box of very rare and expensive cigars then insured them against, among other things, fire. Within a month, having smoked his entire stockpile of these great cigars and without yet having even one month complete Mr. Satodiya extractor filed a claim against the insurance company. In his claim, the Mr.Satodiya Extractor stated the cigars were lost ‘in a series of small fire. ‘The insurance company refused to pay, citing the obvious reason, that the man had consumed the cigars in the normal fashion. Mr. Satodiya Extractor went in court.

While delivering the ruling, the judge agreed with the insurance company that the claim was frivolous!! The judge stated nevertheless, that the Mr. Satodiya Extractor held a policy from the company, in which it had warranted that the cigars were insurable and also guaranteed that it would insure them against fire, without defining what is considered to be ‘unacceptable fire’, and was thus obligated to pay the claim. So, rather than endure a lengthy and costly appeal process, the insurance company accepted the ruling, and paid Rs. 15,000 to the Mr. Satodiya Extractor for his loss of the cigars lost in the ‘fires’

(NOW FOR THE BEST PART)

After the Mr. Satodiya Extractor cashed the cheques, the insurance company has arrested him on 24 counts of ARSON!!!?

With his own insurance claim and testimony from the previous case was used against him, the Mr. Satodiya Extractor was convicted of ‘intentionally burning his insured property’ and was sentenced to 24 months in jail and a Rs. 24,000 fine.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031