Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dhanjibhai Bhikhabhai Ranparia Vs C.C.E. & S.T.-Rajkot (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Excise Appeal No. 519 Of 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/03/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Dhanjibhai Bhikhabhai Ranparia Vs C.C.E. & S.T.-Rajkot (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

As regard the appellant M/s. Dhanjibhai Bhikhabhai Ranparia, he is the raw material supplier. The raw material supplier cannot be implicated for clandestine removal of the goods by the buyer of the raw material. Therefore, the penalty on M/s. Dhanjibhai Bhikhabhai Ranparia is not sustainable.

Purchasing Goods without invoice/bill amounts to abatement for evasion of duty – Penalty reduced by CESTAT

As regard other appellants as I discussed above the lapse on their part is that they have purchased goods without proper invoice/bills from M/s. Rainbow Engineering Co therefore, to some extent they are responsible for evasion of duty by M/s. Rainbow Engineering Co. Accordingly, considering the overall facts of the case and the amount of duty involved, I am of the view that the penalty of Rs. 1 Lakh in each appellants is very harsh, therefore, I reduce the penalty from 1 Lakh to 25,000/- each on 4 appellants namely Cosmo Pump, Sai Shereegupta, Gupta Machinery Stores, Geeta Enterprises.

FULL TEXT OF THE CESTAT AHMEDABAD ORDER

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031