This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
CESTAT Must Hear Appeal Despite pre-deposit Under Wrong Head: Delhi HC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Navin Road Lines Vs Assistant Registrar Customs Excise And Service Tax (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Navin Road Lines Vs Assistant Registrar Customs Excise And Service Tax (Delhi High Court)
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 8 January 2025 issued by the Central Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). The dispute concerns the Tribunal’s refusal to entertain the petitioner’s appeal on the basis that the required pre-deposit had not been made correctly. Although the petitioner had deposited the amount, it was paid under the “Excise Head” instead of the designated category due to issues arising from...
Author Info
