Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Elegant International Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (Adjudication) (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Elegant International Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (Adjudication) (CESTAT Delhi) Conclusion: Transaction value could not be rejected by invoking rule 10A of Valuation Rules in the absence of evidence showing undervaluation. Further, the finding that the silk fabric imported by the other four importers and the silk fabric imported by assessee were identical, as same “article member” was provided in the Bills of Entry could not be sustained. Held: Commissioner of Central Excise (Adjudication) passed order rejecting the transaction value of the imported silk fabrics from China through 37...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930