This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Differential Duty for Provisional Release is Not a Pre-Deposit: CESTAT Delhi
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Vortex Rubber Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs Principal Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) (CESTAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Vortex Rubber Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs Principal Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) (CESTAT Delhi)
This order addresses two appeals arising from a common Order-in-Appeal dated March 27, 2024, concerning Vortex Rubber Industries Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Director, Shri H.S. Chadha. The company is engaged in importing Chinese tyres of the “Infinity” and “Wanli” brands.
Background of the Case
In an investigation against M/s Shivani Industries, which was managed and financially controlled by Shri H.S. Chadha, the premises of the appellant were searched...
Author Info
