This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Customs Refund Claim Not Maintainable Without Reassessment of Bill of Entry: CESTAT Chennai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- TATA Projects Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
TATA Projects Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
The appeal was filed against the Order-in-Appeal dated 15.05.2020 rejecting the appellant’s refund claim arising from the import of aluminium framework from South Korea. The appellant had imported the goods under four Bills of Entry, classified them under CTH 7610 9020, and claimed exemption from Basic Customs Duty under Sl. No. 610 of Notification No. 15/2009-Cus. During scrutiny by the Risk Management System (RMS), Customs noticed that the supplier had classified the goods under CTH 8480.60, resulting in a ...
Author Info
