This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Customs Broker not required to physically inspect premise of client to ensure their functioning
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- United Cargo Services Vs Commissioner of Customs (Airport &
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 19/05/2025
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
United Cargo Services Vs Commissioner of Customs (Airport & General) (CESTAT Delhi)
CESTAT Delhi held that Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations doesn’t requires the Customs Broker to physically go to the premises of the client to ensure that they are functioning at the premises.
Facts- M/s United Cargo Services is a Customs Broker having license valid up to 11.03.2022 issued by Commissioner of Customs (Airport & General), New Customs House, New Delhi. It is aggrieved by the Order-in-Original dated 11.11.2024 by which its Customs Broker Licence was revoked, its secur...
Author Info
