Nirav Dilipkumar Desai Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) The Assessing Officer observed that the assessee has shown Rs. 11,86,798/- under the head “income from other sources” and in the schedule of other sources. The assessee has shown Rs. 41,15,221/- and claimed expenses of Rs. 29,28,423/-. The Assessing Officer further observed that the expenses claimed has no […]
Expenses incurred by assessee-doctor on organizing musical programme for his professional colleagues, sponsoring garba event organized in the society where he resided and gifts given to fellow doctors on the occasion of marriage or diwali could not be said to be allowable under section 37 for computing his taxable income as all these expenses, could not be said to have been incurred wholly and exclusively for the profession of the assessee so as to qualify for deduction u/s 37(1).
ITAT Ahmedabad held that mere receipt of amount via banking channel doesn’t make the transaction as genuine. Addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act sustainable because of non-establishment of identity of creditor, genuineness of transaction and credit worthiness of the parties.
Lilaben Bhagabhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) CIT(A) has categorically observed that the print out of share trading from the brokers related to share transaction statement was unsigned documents and the Assessing Officer has taken the loss on the basis of information provided by National Stock Exchange, Bombay. It is pertinent to note that the […]
Ved Indian Heritage Haat Foundation Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Admittedly, the assessee is running its business from the rented premises which was taken for the lock in period of 60 months. Furthermore, in the rent agreement, there was the clause of renewal of the agreement. Accordingly, AO was of the view that the expenditures incurred […]
ITAT Ahmedabad held that as per CBDT circular no. 4/2007 dated 15.6.2007 and 6/2016 dated 29-2-2016, person can hold shares as both investment and stock-in-trade Accordingly income will be taxable based on the type in which share is hold.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that the transaction charges are actually additional cost of funds raised for the purpose of business Hence expenditure incurred on account of the same was wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that in an identical matter, jurisdictional High Court ruled the matter in favour of the assessee, however, later on Apex Court held otherwise. Accordingly, the issue was debatable do to which levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable.
ITAT held that assessee cannot be denied benefit of exemption for which it is entitled merely on the lapse of procedural requirement i.e. delay in filing audit report in prescribed form.
Dashrathbhai Shivabhai Chaudhary Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) The assessee is engaged in farming and trading of milk and seeds. As per the information made available, the assessee made cash deposit of Rs. 21,95,000/- with Saving Bank Account. Being agricultural and the agricultural income is exempt the assessee did not file any return of income under […]
