DGR Farms & Leisures Limited failed to file balance sheets for 4 years. The company and its directors must now pay a penalty of ₹1.68 lakh to ₹2 lakh each. This order by the Registrar of Companies highlights the importance of filing financial statements on time.
Authorized Representative of the company highlighted the company’s status as a private limited entity during the fiscal year 2015-16, arguing that the provisions concerning the constitution of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee were inapplicable.
The company and its directors have been penalized for not filing financial statements for two financial years. This order highlights the importance of companies complying with financial filing requirements.
Learn how MCA RD reduces penalty from 67.16 Lakh to 13.43 Lakh for unspent CSR fund transfer delays. Details of the case and grounds for penalty reduction.
Explore the significant MCA decision as penalty for non-appointment of Company Secretary drops from 15 lakh to 2.25 lakh for Trane Technologies India Private Limited directors.
Read the adjudication order by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs on Tridib Industries Limiteds violations of Companies Act, including penalties and analysis.
Explore the Ministry of Corporate Affairs adjudication order imposing penalties on Thana Electric Supply Company Limited for violating Section 92 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Ministry of Corporate Affairs imposes Rs. 180,000 penalty on M/S Mukund M Chitale & Co., auditors of The Peerless General Finance & Investment Co Ltd, for Section 143(3) violations.
A plain reading of the provisions of Section 188 makes it amply clear that a member who intends getting his proposed resolutions included for circulation to members must have not less than one twentieth of the total voting power of all the members at the date of the requisition or must be not less than 100 members in number to exercise such a right.
The issues regarding genuineness of the sale deed, undervaluation, etc. are beyond the purview of instant CP, since a consideration of oppression and mismanagement arises only if the petitioners are found to be shareholders of the company. That issue being held against them the other issues pleaded in the CP do not arise. The petitioners have approached the Bench with unclean hands and they are not entitled to any equitable reliefs. The attempt of the petitioners to re-agitate the concluded issues is nothing but an abuse of the process of the Court. The company petition is devoid of any merits.
