Sponsored
    Follow Us:

CAAR

I-MAS POS consisting of Nickle/Cobalt Hydroxide, Graphite & moisture classifiable under CTH 28254000

January 23, 2022 594 Views 0 comment Print

In re Smartage Projects Pvt ltd (CAAR Mumbai) Thus, it is in terms of the chapter note 1 of chapter 28 read with Rules 1, 2 and 3(a) of the GIR, the goods proposed to be imported i.e. I-MAS POS, consisting of Nickle Hydroxide (78-80%), Cobalt Hydroxide (2-2.5%), Graphite (12-18%) and moisture (2.8%) is classifiable […]

Evans Consoles merit classification under heading 8537

January 20, 2022 1488 Views 0 comment Print

In re Evans Consoles Corporation (CAAR Delhi) Product under consideration is described as ‘Evans Consoles’ in the product literature, which is equipped with switches, electric motors and other electronic equipment, meant for performing specialized functions. These Consoles will be designed according the requirements of the customers in India as per the contracts, will be manufactured […]

Classification of GPON ONT (Gigabit Passive Optical Networks Optical Network Termination))

January 20, 2022 4137 Views 0 comment Print

In re Netlink ICT Private Limited (CAAR Mumbai) M/s. Netlink ICT Private Limited filed an application on 30.08.2021 seeking advance rulings on the classification of GPON ONT and applicability of Sr. No. 13P of the Notification No. 24/2005-Customs, dated 01.03.2005 or Sr. No. 421 of Notification No. 50/2017- Customs, dated 30.06.2017 on the said device. […]

CAA can decide on request for exemption from customs duty on import of e-cycles from China

January 16, 2022 1236 Views 0 comment Print

Question posed for advance ruling, couched as it is for seeking classification of e-cycle, is essentially a prayer made for exemption from customs duty on import of such e-cycles from China, which is beyond the powers vested with this Authority.

Clear Float Glass with Absorbent layer classifiable under heading 70.05

January 12, 2022 2202 Views 0 comment Print

In re Chandrakala Associates (CAAR Mumbai) The subject goods for which advance ruling has been sought, their characteristics, manufacturing process, utility etc. are already mentioned in the aforementioned paras. The subject goods are clear float glass, with an absorbent layer, which is fluorescent under UV illumination. The subject goods are not wired, not tinted and not […]

Data projector classifiable under sub-heading 85286200

January 12, 2022 738 Views 0 comment Print

In re Audio Distribution House Pvt. Ltd (CAAR Mumbai) The projector under consideration has got certain additional ports such as HDMI, audio, composite, etc. Further, the product is compatible with an aspect ratio of 16:9, though the aspect ratio of 4:3 is native. These facts make it capable of being a video projector and consequently […]

Classification of Auxiliary Power Unit (APU)- Off Combo Unit

January 12, 2022 1917 Views 0 comment Print

In re Alvest Millennium Aviation Leasing IFSC Pvt Ltd (CAAR Mumbai) According to the HSN Explanatory Notes, the heading 8803 covers parts of the goods falling in heading 88.01 or 88.02, provided the parts fulfil both the following conditions: – i. They must be identifiable as being suitable for use solely or principally with the […]

Parts of electronic toy cars merit classification under heading 9503

January 12, 2022 3315 Views 0 comment Print

The goods described in the application as parts of electronic toy car, in semi-assembled form as presented before me merit classification under heading 9503 of First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act.

Classification of Fatty Alcohol Ethoxylate (1- mole, 2-mole, 7-mole)

December 25, 2021 4986 Views 0 comment Print

In re VVF (India) Limited (CAAR Mumbai) CAAR held that the goods ‘Fatty Alcohol Ethoxylate (1-mole, 2-moles, 7-mole)’ are non-ionic organic surface-active agents and merit classification under subheading 34021300 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975, subject to prescribed conditions under note 3 to Chapter 34. FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF CUSTOMS AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, MUMBAI […]

Unsubstantiated allegations against applicant goes against the spirit of advance rulings

December 25, 2021 576 Views 0 comment Print

In the present case, the applicant has disclosed all relevant facts in the applications, which were also shared with the jurisdictional commissionerate. The unsubstantiated allegations of the commissionerate against the applicant in this proceeding are therefore unwarranted and go against the spirit of advance rulings.

Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031