In my view, having regard to the facts and circumstances, the statutory authority was bound to afford a personal hearing to the petitioner through video conferencing as mentioned above. The result of this infraction would be that the impugned orders will have to be set aside.
The application preferred by the petitioner for recall of the said order was also rejected by the Supreme Court vide order dated 25.10.2019. It is thereafter that petitioner-assessee preferred a review petition.
Allahabad High Court quashes GST demand due to notices uploaded incorrectly on portal and remands case for fresh proceedings per prescribed procedure.
Absence of adherence to procedure laid down in Section 144B of Income Tax Act render the assessment order patently illegal: Bombay HC in Teerth Developers And Teerth Realties JV (AOP) Vs Additional/ Joint/Deputy/ ACIT/ ITO
Punjab and Haryana High Court held that cancellation of GST registration for entire places of business for non-submission of NOC by landowner of additional place of business is complete non-application of mind. Accordingly, cancellation of GST registration not justified.
Allahabad High Court rules EVs bought before Oct 14, 2022, are ineligible for tax refund under the Uttar Pradesh Electric Vehicle Policy, citing strict exemption criteria.
Delhi High Court, in the case of smuggling of Methaqualone denied the bail application since threshold of Section 37 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [NDPS Act] not having been crossed.
A search was conducted on the premises of the Assessee on 17.10.2000 and a debit card of the overseas bank – Barclays Bank, PLC St.40, Birmingham, London, United Kingdom was found in the joint name of the Assessee and his wife (Smt. Jyoti Jaggi).
The present appeal under Section 28KA of the Customs Act, 1962 has been preferred by the appellant i.e. Vivo Mobile India Private Limited assailing the order dated 13.12.2023 passed by the Customs Authority of Advance Rulings.
Punjab & Haryana HC invalidates SCN under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act due to the absence of faceless assessment mandated under Section 144B.
