In re Hilti Manufacturing India Pvt.Ltd. (GST AAR Gujarat) On careful reading of the Service contract between the applicant and service receiver, applicant’s submissions, even those during the personal hearing, we find that goods were sent by Hilti Aktiengesellschaft (hereinafter referred to as recipient) to the applicant which are required to be made physically available […]
In re Adarsh Plant Protected Ltd (GST AAR Gujarat) As per HSN Notes, the other agricultural machinery includes seed dusting machines usually consisting of one or more hoppers feeding a revolving drum in which the seeds are coated with insecticidal or fungicidal powders. We find that this Chapter Heading is more appropriate for classifying the […]
In re Tirupati Construction (GST AAR Gujarat) Whether the activity of composite supply of work contract service by way of development and construction of sports complex at Maninagar, Ahmedabad for the Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority, and as detailed in the tender document merit classification at Sr. No. 3(vi)(a) of Notification No. 11/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 […]
In re Dishman Carbogen Amcis Ltd. (GST AAR Gujarat) 1. The applicant, M/s. Dishman Carbogen Amcis Ltd. sought Advance Ruling on the applicability of IGST on the Ocean Freight services provided by a person located in a non-taxable territory by way of transportation of goods by a vessel from a place outside India upto the […]
In re Dishman Carbogen Amcis Ltd. (GST AAR Gujarat) Whether it is required by the applicant to charge GST on the amount collected from the employees towards canteen charges? applicant has arranged a canteen for its employees, which is run by a third party Canteen Service Provider. As per their arrangement, part of the Canteen […]
In re Global Gruh Udyog (GST AAR Gujarat) Authority for advance ruling, Gujarat, held that For classification of a product its ingredients, manufacturing process and trade parlance is important and not it’s size and shape. Accordingly, papad of any size and shape will attract NIL GST. Earlier it was held that fryums attracts 18 % […]
In re Shivam Agro Industries (GST AAAR Gujarat) AAAR confirm the Advance Ruling No. GUJ/GAAR/R/79/2020 dated 17.09.2020 to the extent it has been appealed, by holding that the products ‘Zn EDTA’ and ‘Fe EDTA’ being supplied by M/s. Shivam Agro Industries are classifiable under heading 38.24 (Tariff Item 3824 99 90) of the First Schedule […]
In re Global Vectra Helicorp Limited (GST AAAR Gujarat) In terms of the valuation provisions under GST legislation, amount recovered as reimbursement by the appellant M/s. Global Vectra Helicorp Ltd. from the customer, for the fuel procured for use in the helicopter provided on rent to customer is required to be included in the value […]
In re Vadilal Industries Ltd. (GST AAR Gujarat) 1. ‘Paratha’ merits classification at HSN 21069099. We find that GST rate of 5% is applicable subject to (i) products shall be classified at HSN 1905 or 2106 and (ii) description shall be khakhra, plain chapatti or roti. In the issue in hand, we find that the […]
In re Tirupati Construction (GST AAR Gujarat) Whether the activity of composite supply of works contract service by way of construction of fish market for the Panchayat (Road and Building) Division, Valsad District Panchayat merits classification at Serial Number 3(vi)(a) of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax(Rate) dated 28-6-17 (hereinafter referred to as said NT)?” Ans. The subject Supply […]
