This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Madras HC Dismisses CENVAT Refund Claim as Substituted Notification Applies Retrospectively
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Doosan Infracore India Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner (Madras High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Madras High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Doosan Infracore India Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner (Madras High Court)
The Madras High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by an Export Oriented Unit challenging the rejection of its refund claims under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 read with Notification No. 27/2012-CE (NT). The petitioner had claimed refunds of input service tax credit for the periods October 2015 to December 2015 and January 2016 to March 2016. The refund applications were filed on 27.12.2016 and 28.03.2017, respectively. The respondent rejected the claims on the ground that the...
Author Info
