This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Anticipatory Bail Denied Due to Key Evidence Linking Accused to Cyber Fraud
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Mohamad Naseem Vs State of Haryana (Punjab And Haryana High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Punjab and Haryana HC
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Mohamad Naseem Vs State of Haryana (Punjab And Haryana High Court)
The case concerns a petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, wherein the petitioner sought anticipatory bail after his earlier application had been rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge, Panchkula. The FIR, lodged on 11.08.2025 at the Cyber Crime Police Station, Panchkula, alleged the commission of offences under Sections 318(4) and 319 of the BNS, 2023. The FIR was based on a complaint by an advocate who claimed he had been deceived through a Facebook Messenger inte...
Author Info
