Company Law India: Read latest Company law news & updates, acts, circular, notifications & articles issued by MCA amendment in companies Act 2013. Article on Loans Company formation XBRL, Schedule VI IFRS.
Company Law : Overview of Form STK-2 under Section 248(2), covering eligibility, ineligible companies, documents, process, filing fee and ROC pr...
Company Law : Step-by-step procedure for redemption of preference shares under Section 55, including CRR, ROC filings, statutory registers and f...
Company Law : Step-by-step procedure for altering the Object Clause under Section 13, filing Form MGT-14, and SEBI LODR compliance for listed co...
Company Law : Article explains the provisions governing appointment of proxies under Section 105 of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 19 of the C...
Company Law : Legal Provision and Obligations for a company with respect to Securities issues by Private Placement This Article outlines the leg...
Company Law : ICSI will provide CSEET June 2026 evaluated answer books through its portal from 16 July 2026 without RTI, subject to prescribed t...
Company Law : ICSI declared the CSEET June 2026 results on 15 July 2026. The pass percentage is 67.59%, and e-Result-cum-Marks Statements are av...
Company Law : MCA has cautioned stakeholders against phishing calls, WhatsApp messages, emails, fake websites, and ZIP attachments impersonating...
Company Law : ICSI has urged PESB to recognize Company Secretaries as eligible for Board-level and Functional Director positions in CPSEs. The r...
Company Law : ICSI has urged the Government to amend the law to allow Company Secretaries in Practice to appear before DRTs and DRATs. It argues...
Company Law : NCLAT set aside directions to hand over two properties to the RP, holding Civil Court-recognised possessory rights could not be di...
Company Law : NCLAT dismissed the IRP's appeal, upheld ₹3 lakh remuneration and held reliance on K. Sashidhar was distinguishable in the fee d...
Company Law : Companies and individuals prosecuted by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) under the Companies Act, 2013 were not entit...
Company Law : NCLT Mumbai sanctioned a composite scheme under Sections 230–232 and 66 after finding statutory compliance and no objections fro...
Company Law : NCLT Chennai sanctioned the amalgamation scheme after statutory compliance, undertakings on regulatory observations, and absence o...
Company Law : ROC Delhi I directed rectification of MGT-7 filing relating to CFS disclosures under Section 450, with zero penalty recorded in th...
Company Law : ROC Delhi I directed rectification of defective Section 92(4) filings within 30 days and recorded nil penalty under its adjudicati...
Company Law : ROC Delhi I directed rectification of Section 137(1) AOC-4 filing defects within 30 days and recorded nil penalty in its adjudicat...
Company Law : ROC Delhi I directed rectification of AOC-4 for non-selection of the CFS option under Section 137(1); penalty table records zero p...
Company Law : ROC Delhi I directed rectification of AOC-4 for non-selection of the CFS option under Section 137(1); penalty table records zero p...
ROC Chennai imposed Section 450 penalties for omission of allottees’ occupation details in the PAS-3 list under Rule 12(2) of the 2014 Rules.
ROC Chennai imposed Section 450 penalties for omission of PAN and e-mail details of allottees in the PAS-3 list under Rule 14(6) of the 2014 Rules.
ROC Chennai imposed a Section 450 penalty on the auditor for failing to report required Specified Bank Notes disclosure under Rule 11(d).
ROC Chennai imposed a Section 450 penalty on the auditor for failing to report related party disclosure non-compliance under Section 143(3)(e).
ROC Chennai imposed a Section 450 penalty on the auditor for failing to report related party disclosure non-compliance under Section 143(3)(e).
ROC Chennai imposed a ₹10,000 penalty on the auditor under Section 450 for failing to report related party disclosure non-compliance under Section 143(3)(e).
ROC Chhattisgarh imposed a ₹50,000 penalty under Section 159 for violation of Section 155 after the applicant was found holding two DINs.
ROC Chhattisgarh imposed penalties under Section 12(8) after official communications to the company’s registered office were returned as “Not Known.”
ROC Ahmedabad imposed penalties under Section 450 for carrying on business beyond the MOA object clause before registration of its alteration under Section 13.
ROC Chennai imposed penalties under Section 450 for violation of Section 4(1)(c) where the company’s MOA objects did not align with its business activities.
