Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Property Company (P) Ltd. Vs Rohinten Daddy Mazda (Supreme Court of India)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Property Company (P) Ltd. Vs Rohinten Daddy Mazda (Supreme Court of India) CLB Has No Power to Condon Delay Under Section 58(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 Prior to Section 433 Coming into Force The Supreme Court examined whether the Company Law Board (CLB) had the authority to condone delay in filing an appeal under Section 58(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 during the transitional phase when the 2013 Act had come into force but the NCLT/NCLAT were not yet constituted. The appeal in question was filed with a delay of 249 days, which the CLB condoned by invoking its inherent powers and by applyin...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031