Navodaya Education Trust Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) it is submitted that the CPC, Bengaluru made the impugned adjustment in its intimation u/s 143(1), erroneously and as such the same was rectifiable as per the provisions of section 154. The CIT(Appeals) has erred in confirming the the same and rejecting the rectification application filed by the […]
In light of the application for the withdrawal of the application for advance ruling the Authority hereby agrees to the withdrawal of the application for the advance ruling without going into the merit of the case and passing any ruling on the issue for which advance ruling was sought for.
In re Kriti Industries (India) Limited (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh) Applicant believes that the product ‘sprinkler system, drip irrigation system including laterals, P.V.C. Pipes, other components and accessories’ is classified under HSN 8424 and applicable tax rate is 12%, details as per the Notification No.01/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 . The entry No. 195B […]
DCIT Vs Sasken Network Engineering Limited (ITAT Bangalore) In terms of section 199, Rule 37BA provides that credit for tax deducted at source and paid to the Central Government shall be given for the Assessment Year for which such income is assessable. In case the income is assessable over a number of years, credit for […]
Swan Silk Private Limited Vs ACIT (Karnataka High Court) The Assessing Officer with regard to claim disallowance of 50% of credit card expenses has held that the assessee has not adduced any evidence that drawings made by the Directors through their personal credit card are in fact, incurred for the purpose of business of the […]
In re Apar Industries Ltd. (GST AAAR Gujarat) Marine pressure tight cables and non-pressure tight cables manufactured and supplied by the applicant to the Indian Navy are essential and integral parts of the submarine warship and hence the benefit of reduced rate of GST of 5% is available to the appellant as per Sr. No. […]
In re Piyush Jayantilal Dobaria (Jay Khodiyar Agency) (GST AAAR Gujarat) The product different shapes and sizes Papad involved in the present case merit classification under Tariff heading No. 19059040 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and chargeable to NIL rate of Goods and Services Tax as per Sl. No. 96 of Notification No. 02/2017-CT […]
In re Platinum Motocorp LLP (GST AAAR Haryana) We find that use to which the Demo Vehicles are put to, does not fit into the uses which find mention in sub-Section 17(5). The vehicles under question are not meant for ‘further supply of such motor vehicles’, but are first put to the mentioned uses. These […]
In re BMW India Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAAR Haryana) We find that none of the uses to which the BMW Vehicles are put to, fits into the uses which find mention in sub-Section 17(5). The vehicles under question are not meant for ‘further supply of such motor vehicles’ i.e further supply as such’, but are […]
In re Bal Raksha Bharat alias Save the Children (GST AAR Jharkhand) 1. Whether Services provided by SCI to JWDS can be considered as services being provided to State Government? 2. Whether the scope of work as per the agreement is under Training program? 3. Whether the consideration payable by JWDS to SCI under the […]
