Lovely Traders Vs CCE & ST (CESTAT Chandigarh) Appellant submits that the appellant is not liable to pay service tax on the commission received by them. He further submits that BSNL has discharged service tax liability on full value equal to MRP (maximum retail price) which was inclusive of the appellant’s discount/ commission and hence […]
Assessee has made a vague claim of medical reasons without any supporting evidences to justify his stand that he was suffering from ill-health and Doctors advised him to take rest.
ITAT held that co-owners showed capital gains of different amount, is not a valid ground for issue of notice under section 148
Before issuance of notice under Section 148 of the Act, approval of the higher authorities is a mandatory statutory requirement.
Assessee cannot include interest received on deposits as business receipts and estimate net profit under section 44AD on such interest income
Vivek Saxena Vs Ashish Verma, Chief Income Tax (Allahabad High court) The present contempt application has been filed under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for punishing the Opposite Party for willful disobedience of the judgment and order dated 01.12.2022 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 16848 of 2022. It is […]
No adjustment on account of a different assessable value adopted at Pipavav Port cannot be made in the refund amount as the import and clearance made at Pipavav Port is an independent clearance made by different Assessing Officers.
Read about Ansal Properties vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) case. Penalty not sustainable on QIP and 80-IB disallowance. Full text of ITAT Delhi order
Facility of generation of Document Reference Number (RFN) and use of the same in all offline communications with the Taxpayers and other concerned persons relating to Goods and Services Tax
In view of the foregoing, the DC finds that Mr. Ravinder Kumar Goel has over-charged his fee by not deducting the liquidation cost from his fees computed as per regulation 4(2)(b) of Liquidation Regulations. Mr. Ravinder Kumar Goel should not have taken the fees on the amount payable to suppliers even though this was pending […]
