Raymond Limited Vs Commissioner, Central Excise Customs & Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) Whether show cause notice dated 28.09.2001 has been validly issued, for raising demand of service tax on GTO/GTA services received by the appellant for the disputed period, in terms of the prevailing Section 73 under reverse charge, and Hon‟ble Bombay High Court in […]
Objective of Consultation Paper Review of Price Band and Book Building Framework for public issues is to seek comments from public on SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2018 relating to framework of book building
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA RBI/2021-22/105 DOR.ACC.REC.57/21.04.018/2021-22 October 4, 2021 All Member Banks of the Indian Banks’ Association covered under the 11th Bipartite Settlement and Joint Note dated November 11, 2020 Madam / Sir, Enhancement in family pension of employees of banks – Treatment of additional liability The Indian Banks’ Association (IBA) has approached us for […]
Several banks have approached RBI to clarify the amount of capital funds that can be raised overseas. It is clarified that eligible amount for purpose of issue of PDIs in foreign currency would mean the higher of (a) 1.5% of Risk Weighted Assets (RWAs) and (b) Total Additional Tier 1 capital as on March 31 of the previous financial year.
Shahi Exports Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CE & ST (CESTAT Chandigarh) I find that it is an amount paid by the appellant as service tax under protest during the course of investigation. This fact is not in dispute. When any amount paid under protest, it is neither pre-deposit nor service tax; it is only a […]
PFRDA is pleased to extend the online and paperless process of exit to the Subscribers of Government Sector as an option in addition to the existing physical mode of exit. The online exit would be integrated with Instant Bank Account Verification as per the existing guidelines as part of enhanced due diligence in the interest of Subscribers. The facility would also be available to the employees of Autonomous Bodies of Central/State Government who are covered in NPS.
A careful perusal of Section 73 of the CG&ST Act in conjunction with Rule 142 makes it clear that non adherence to Rule 142 had caused prejudice to the writ petitioner qua impugned order and therefore it is a rule which necessarily needs to be adhered to,if prejudice is to be eliminated in the case on hand. In other words, it is not a mere procedural requirement but on the facts and circumstances of this case, it becomes clear that it tantamount to trampling the rights of writ petitioner.
Mushtak Khan Vs ITO (ITAT Indore) We observe that the assessee is into this business as stamp vendor since last many years and Appeal is against disallowance of commission expenditure claimed by the assessee to have been paid to various customers/registry consultants purchasing the stamp papers. Now as far as the expenditure for commission of […]
ITO (TDS) Vs Tata Teleservices Limited (ITAT Delhi) ITAT held that the sale of recharge voucher coupons and starter kits and the discount offered to the distributors would not attract TDS provisions u/s 194H of the Act and as such no default U/s 201(1) of the Act can be attributed to the assessee. Sole issue […]
Faqir Chand Vs National E-Assessment Centre (Delhi High Court) this Court is of the view that final assessment order has been passed in violation of principles of natural justice inasmuch as the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to file a reply to the Show Cause Notice and draft assessment order dated 09th June, […]
