Sitaram India Ltd. Vs Commissioner CE & CGST Division-E (CESTAT Delhi) It is observed that activity of collecting toll is covered under the negative list of services. The Appellant has been provided with the Fee Collection Rights i.e., the right to collect toll tax and not to provide any service on behalf of NHAI. Further, […]
Deputy Commissioner of State Tax Vs A. J. Enterprises (NAA) NAA observe that the DGAP in his Report dated 20.08.2020 has mentioned the investigation period from 15.11.2017 to 30.09.2019 while the profiteering has been computed upto 31.10.2019 as has been shown in Annexure 25 of his Report. The DGAP vide his supplementary Report dated 24.11.2020 […]
Under the Code, RP plays a central role in resolution process of the CD, he is appointed by the Adjudicating Authority as an officer of the Court to conduct the resolution process and it is the duty of RP to conduct CIRP with integrity and accountability in the process and to take reasonable care and […]
With a view to making the disclosure more accurate and efficient, the Exchange in consultation with SEBI, is introducing a facility of filing of statement of redressal of investor grievance in XBRL mode under Regulation 13 (3) of “LODR Regulations” with immediate effect.
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA NOTIFICATION New Delhi, the 12th April, 2022 (No. 3 of 2022) F.No. A-12015/01/2022-HR/CCI.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (2) of Section 64, read with sub-section (3) of Section 17 of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003) the Competition Commission of India hereby makes the following […]
In re Vasant Fabricators Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Gujarat) Q1. Whether the activity of fabricating and mounting Tankers, Tippers, etc. on the chassis provided by the owner of such chassis i.e. bus body building would be covered under the category of Supply of Services? A1. Supply of Bus body building on the chassis owned by […]
In re Emcure Pharmaceuticals Limited (GST AAR Gujarat) Q1. Whether the recoveries made by the Applicant from the employees for providing canteen facility to its employees are taxable under the GST laws? A1. GST, at the hands of M/s Emcure, is not leviable on the amount representing the employees portion of canteen charges, which is […]
AAR held that GST, at the hands of the M/s Cadila, is not leviable on the amount representing the employees portion of canteen charges, which is collected by M/s Cadila and paid to the Canteen service provider.
In re Royal Techno Projects (India) Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Gujarat) Vide email dated 1-4-22, M/s Royal submitted Work Order dated 1-12-20 for Widening & Strengthening Costg. Slab Drain of Asoj Pilol Road (VR) of Vadodara District under MMGSY 2019-20, from Gujarat State Road and Building Department. We find that vide the Tender to this […]
In re Surat Smart City Development Ltd. (GST AAR Gujarat) Recipient of supply may seek Rulings in cases pertaining to admissibility of ITC of tax paid or deemed to have been paid (Section 97(2)(d)) or when the recipient is liable to pay tax under RCM. We find no such case before us to hold that […]
