Amendment in Para 2.17 of the Foreign Trade Policy 2015-20 on “Prohibition on direct or indirect import and export from/to DPRK (Democratic People’s Republic of Korea) in terms of UNSC resolutions concerning DPRK.
Instant Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the order dated 30.04.2008, passed by the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Chennai in Final Order No.434/2008.
Joint Venture -taxable services provided by the members of the Joint Venture (JV) to the JV and vice versa and inter se between the members of the JV
Smart people take risks while the ignorant ones wait for it. Life is a risky business. You never know when it will hit you harder. So better to be prepared. Women across the world are always perceived as better planners in comparison to their male counterparts.
Estate of Late Vrajlal Mehta Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) We noticed that explanation of the assessee that two bank accounts belonged to Shri Rajesh Mehta have been accepted by the search officials as well as Assessing Officer. We notice that the balance available in those bank accounts have been assessed by the learned CIT(A) only, […]
Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), the apex body for Income Tax Assessments has set up a high powered committee of nine members to prepare a roadmap by February 28, 2018 to do e-based income tax assessment.
Should I pay GST on supplies to myself. To the surprise of ordinary persons, the answer is YES. As per the framework of GST in India, there are strong conceptual reasons, justifying this principle. However, this rule results in anomalous situations in certain cases, imposing unjustifiable burden on certain types of businesses.
CIT Vs Rajasthan and Gujarati Charitable Foundation (Supreme Court of India) Depreciation allowable in assets cost of which has already been allowed as application of income. Amendment in section 11(6) restricting depreciation in such came is prospective in nature. These are the petitions and appeals filed by the Income Tax Department against the orders passed […]
The appeals are filed against the judgment of the learned Single Judge, affirming the right of the petitioner to pay tax under the compounding scheme. The respondent assessee is engaged in the manufacture and sale of ice-creams. The assessments were of the year 2015-2016 and 2016-2017.
These are appeals filed by two assessees who are wife and husband. One appeal in IT(IT)A No.12/Bang/2014 is by Smt.Veena Nambyar directed against the order passed by the CIT (Appeals) -4, Bangalore dt.20.2.2014, in respect of the order of assessment passed. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) dt.27.12.2011.
