ITAT Delhi held that PCIT cannot assume revisional jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income Tax Act when in case of debatable issue, out of the two possible views, AO accepts one of the views.
ITAT Chennai held that transfer pricing adjustment towards brand development services unjustified in absence of contract amongst the assessee and its associated enterprises. Accordingly, AO directed to delete addition made towards brand fee adjustment.
ITAT Kolkata held that addition u/s. 68 of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained share application money is unsustainable as assessee has successfully discharged the burden of proof primarily casted upon it, however, AO failed to conduct independent inquires.
ITAT Delhi held that interest paid on loans borrowed during the course of business of real estate and finance business is allowable as deduction. Accordingly, disallowance of the same deleted.
ITAT Kolkata held that TPO should follow the direction of Hon’ble Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP). Accordingly, matter to the file of ld. TPO/AO for further calculation of TP adjustment by considering the direction of the Hon’ble DRP.
ITAT Delhi held that reopening of assessment under section 148 of the Income Tax Act based on reason to suspect unsustainable as AO failed to demonstrate live link between tangible material and formation of reason to believe that income had escaped assessment.
Madras High Court held that Tax Recovery Officer cannot declare sale made by the assessee in favour of 3rd party as void. It is the function of civil court to declare a transaction as null and void and the Tax Recovery Officer cannot exercise the said function.
Apeejay Surrendra Management Services Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) ITAT Kolkata held that deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act can be added in the hands of beneficial shareholder who is having controlling interest (substantial interest). Facts- Assessee is engaged in the business of Brand Owning and Consultancy. During the year […]
ITAT Delhi held that there is no provision regarding establishment of virtual service PE under India-Singapore DTAA and hence physical rendition of service in India is required under India-Singapore DTAA as per present service PE.
ITAT Mumbai held that rate of interest @18% paid to related party towards unsecured loan is reasonable as rate of interest charged by bank @12% is with security, whereas, rate of interest charged on unsecured loan is without any security.
