Certain notified taxpayers have been preparing and issuing invoices by obtaining Invoice Reference Number (IRN) from Invoice Registration Portal (IRP) (commonly referred as ‘e-invoices’). Details from such e-invoices are be auto-populated in respective tables of GSTR-1.
CBIC has vide Notification No 89/2020 dated 29.11.2020 waived Penalty for non compliance to QR code provisions if complied by April 01, 2021 for default during the period December 1,2020 to March 31,2021. MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS) New Delhi, Notification No. 89/2020–Central Tax Dated: 29th November, […]
The related concerns of the assessee group are involved in financing, money lending and real estate development. The unaccounted transactions conducted by these entities and the unaccounted capital/loan infusion in these entities are estimated to be around Rs.50 crore. The searches, so far, have resulted in the detection of undisclosed income of more than Rs. 450 crore.
The issue under consideration is whether the investment made in two different properties out of the capital gains is eligible for deduction u/s 54F?
Maharashtra GST Department has released List of cases selected for Audit under GST Act, 2017 for the period 2017-2018 on its website. Maharashtra GST Department has selected 3764 cases for GST Audit. List contains Sr. No., GSTIN Registration, Trade Name, Desk ID, Location, Division and Zone. Download List of cases selected for GST Audit in […]
The issue under consideration is whether tax is applicable on securities premium merely because it used to set off losses? AO does not have the jurisdiction to go beyond the net profit shown in the Profit & Loss Account except to the extent provided in the Explanation to section 115J.
The issue under consideration is whether the netting off interest expenditure against interest income is allowed u/s 56 of Income Tax Act?
The issue under consideration is whether the CIT(A) is correct in upholding the action of the Assessing Officer in making a disallowance under section 36(l)(ii) of the Act; being bonus paid to the Directors of the Company by holding that such payments are in lieu of dividend or profits?
The present writ petitions have been filed challenging orders issued by respondent authority whereby the penalty demand of Rs.293,28,50,153 for the assessment years 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, and 2010-11 stayed subject to payment of 20% of the said amount.
The issue under consideration is whether the ld. CIT(A) was justified in upholding the disallowance made on account of unverifiable purchases? Appel Against Revisionary Order u/s 263 should be Filed Before Tribunal: ITAT Mumbai
