Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shiv Arora Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shiv Arora Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Penalty Dies with Quantum – ITAT Delhi Deletes 271AAC Levy – When Assessment Goes, Penalty Goes Too – ITAT Delhi Follows Settled Law Assessee’s assessment was completed ex-parte u/s 144 on 23.04.2024, & a penalty of ₹18.01 lakh was later imposed u/s 271AAC(1). The appeal before CIT(A) was delayed by about ten months & was dismissed on grounds of limitation. Tribunal held that CIT(A) erred in refusing to condone the delay, since sufficient cause was shown, & more importantly, the quantum order was already annulled by CIT(A) on 19.02.2025 ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Patna ITAT: Interest on Delayed Payment of Sales Tax, Service Tax & Employer’s PF Contribution Allowable; TDS Interest Not Deductible Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031