Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) set aside as notice failed to specify specific charge or limb

Case Law Details

Case Name
Smt. Dayawanti Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2005-06
Advertisement
Smt. Dayawanti Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) ITAT Delhi held that notice under section 274 r.w.s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act issued without specifying the specific charge or limb i.e. without striking off the irrelevant limb is erroneous. Accordingly, penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c) cannot be sustained. Facts- The assessment order came to be passed against the Assessee by making addition on account of trading results of Rs. 22,36,679/- and on account of unexplained credit of Rs. 4,52,488/-. A penalty proceeding has been initiated u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act and order of penalty came to be passed on 31/0...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *