Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Malini Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Malini Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai) Assessee received a substantial amount of enhanced compensation along with interest due to compulsory acquisition of agricultural land. In her return of income, she declared the compensation & claimed that the interest received was not taxable, as the land was agricultural & thus outside the scope of “capital asset” under the Income-tax Act. During scrutiny, AO examined the receipt of compensation & noted that interest of ₹1.94 crore was received on the enhanced9 compensation. Applying section 56(2)(viii) read with section 145A(b), AO treated the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930