Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Urmish M. Udani Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Urmish M. Udani Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) No valid notice u/s 143(2); one notice was premature (before return) & the other was time-barred- Entire 147/143(3) assessment held void ab initio – ITAT Mumbai quashes reassessment A survey u/s 133A was conducted in the case of U.S. Roofs Ltd. & U.S. Realty Ltd. (group concerns of the assessee, who was the Managing Director). AO issued a notice u/s 148 on 24.11.2010, & simultaneously issued notice u/s 142(1) & 143(2) on 02.02.2011. However, Assessee filed his return of income only on 03.03.2011. Tribunal noted a crucial jurisdictiona...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031