Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Urmish M. Udani Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Urmish M. Udani Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) No valid notice u/s 143(2); one notice was premature (before return) & the other was time-barred- Entire 147/143(3) assessment held void ab initio – ITAT Mumbai quashes reassessment A survey u/s 133A was conducted in the case of U.S. Roofs Ltd. & U.S. Realty Ltd. (group concerns of the assessee, who was the Managing Director). AO issued a notice u/s 148 on 24.11.2010, & simultaneously issued notice u/s 142(1) & 143(2) on 02.02.2011. However, Assessee filed his return of income only on 03.03.2011. Tribunal noted a crucial jurisdictiona...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Specific Charge, No Penalty: Mumbai ITAT Cancels Section 270A Levy for Defective Notice Mere Investigation Wing Alert Is Not ‘Reason to Believe’: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Reopening Liquor Trader Gets Relief as ITAT Reduces GP Rate to 3.13% & Deletes Separate Expense Disallowance From Clean Chit to Crores in Penalty: SEBI Reopens Suzlon Case and Strikes Hard ITAT Restores Section 69 Matter to AO After Ex Parte Assessment and Appeal Orders View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930