Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vijay Prakash Ghosalkar Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vijay Prakash Ghosalkar Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Once overall source is accepted, Section 69A cannot be invoked merely due to lack of one-to-one correlation- ITAT Mumbai deletes adhoc addition on cash deposits Assessee, an individual lady, did not file her return of income originally for AY 2017-18. On receiving AIR information that she had earned interest income, made cash deposits of ₹42.50 lakh in HDFC Bank, purchased time deposits & mutual funds of ₹30 lakh, AO reopened the case u/s 148. In response, Assessee filed a return declaring ₹9,22,640 including presumptive business income. ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031