Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vijay Prakash Ghosalkar Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vijay Prakash Ghosalkar Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Once overall source is accepted, Section 69A cannot be invoked merely due to lack of one-to-one correlation- ITAT Mumbai deletes adhoc addition on cash deposits Assessee, an individual lady, did not file her return of income originally for AY 2017-18. On receiving AIR information that she had earned interest income, made cash deposits of ₹42.50 lakh in HDFC Bank, purchased time deposits & mutual funds of ₹30 lakh, AO reopened the case u/s 148. In response, Assessee filed a return declaring ₹9,22,640 including presumptive business income. ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Specific Charge, No Penalty: Mumbai ITAT Cancels Section 270A Levy for Defective Notice Mere Investigation Wing Alert Is Not ‘Reason to Believe’: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Reopening Liquor Trader Gets Relief as ITAT Reduces GP Rate to 3.13% & Deletes Separate Expense Disallowance From Clean Chit to Crores in Penalty: SEBI Reopens Suzlon Case and Strikes Hard ITAT Restores Section 69 Matter to AO After Ex Parte Assessment and Appeal Orders View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930