Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kabir Mulchandani Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2000-01
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kabir Mulchandani Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Assessee, Kabir Mulchandani, had not filed his return for AY 2000-01 within time. AO completed assessment ex parte u/s 144 determining total income at ₹3.14 crore, making additions under various heads-salary, deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e), unexplained cash credits, unexplained expenditure, etc. CIT(A) initially dismissed the appeal, but ITAT remanded the matter in 2007 for fresh consideration. Upon re-adjudication u/s 250 r.w.s. 254, CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal and sustained only: ₹23,21,000 as deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e); and ₹18,75,000 as un...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031