Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Aadinath Gems And Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Aadinath Gems And Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Addition u/s 68 Needs Year-Specific Nexus – ITAT Deletes Premium, Sends Back Capital Issue- Fresh Verification Ordered: ITAT Remands Share Application Money Dispute to AO Assessee, engaged in the business of trading in diamonds, had filed return declaring income of Rs.1.50 lakh. The return was selected for scrutiny & AO noticed that Assessee had raised share application money of Rs.70 lakh & share premium of Rs.6.40 lakh.  In respect of Rs.6.40 lakh, Tribunal noted that the amount was received in F.Y. 2007-08 relevant to A.Y...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930