Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sureshkumar Prabhulal Thakkar Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sureshkumar Prabhulal Thakkar Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) AO Failed to Disprove Evidence- Penalty Not Automatic on Disallowance of Expense Claim- ITAT Ahmedabad Cancels 271(1)(c) Penalty – The appeal was filed by Assessee against the order of CIT(A), NFAC, confirming penalty u/s 271(1)(c). Assessee had filed return declaring income of Rs.34.40 lakh, including LTCG of Rs.35.59 lakh on sale of land. In assessment, AO disallowed Rs.7.96 lakh claimed towards cost of improvement & transfer expenses, holding that since Assessee was only 1/7th co-owner & no other co-owners claimed such expense...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930