Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Suvarna Gramin Bigarsheti Sah. Pat Sanstha Maryadit Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Suvarna Gramin Bigarsheti Sah. Pat Sanstha Maryadit Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Assessee, a co-operative credit society, filed appeal against CIT(A), NFAC order dated 02.05.2024 arising from assessment framed u/s 144. There was a delay of 242 days in filing appeal. Assessee explained that the impugned order was received in the email account of an ex-employee & was not communicated in time. Tribunal, relying on Collector, Land Acquisition Vs Katiji (1987) 2 SCC 107 & Inder Singh Vs State of MP (2025 INSC 382), condoned the delay holding that there was “reasonable cause.” On merits, AO had ma...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930