Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ambika Metaliks Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ambika Metaliks Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Kolkata) Technicalities Can’t Defeat Justice: Denial Without Basis Unjustified – Full Brought Forward Losses & MAT Credit Allowed The appeal arose from the order of the CIT(A), dated 22.10.2024 & pertained to Assessment Year 2016-17. At the threshold, the appeal was filed with a delay of 63 days. Assessee produced an affidavit explaining genuine & bonafide reasons for the delay. Accepting the explanation, Tribunal condoned the delay to advance the cause of justice. The first substantive issue related to the set-off of brought forward busi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930