Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Thejaswini Jakkaraju Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2024-25
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Thejaswini Jakkaraju Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) 87A Rebate cannot be denied merely on revised return – Tribunal Sides with Taxpayer; Failure to claim rebate u/s 87A in the original return is an error that can be corrected through a revised return & denial of such rebate in processing is not valid Bangalore ITAT considered denial of rebate u/s 87A on technical grounds. Assessee had filed original return of income on 22.06.2024 under the old regime, which was processed u/s 143(1) on 30.06.2024 without adjustment. Subsequently, on 11.07.2024, she filed a revised return claiming rebate u/s 87A...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930