Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT Remands 80G Approval for 5% Test- Minor Pooja Expenses Won’t Kill 80G

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 7484
Case Name
Sarvabhaoom Hindu Dharam Srichobees Avtar Tatwagyan Mandir Trust Vs CIT (Exemption) (ITAT Indore)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement


Sarvabhaoom Hindu Dharam Srichobees Avtar Tatwagyan Mandir Trust Vs CIT (Exemption) (ITAT Indore)

Charitable-cum-Religious Trust Not Fully Barred – ITAT Remands 80G Approval for 5% Test- Minor Pooja Expenses Won’t Kill 80G

Charitable-cum-Religious Trust Not Fully Barred – Minor Pooja Expenses Won’t Kill 80G -ITAT Remands 80G Approval for 5% Test

Assessee, a public trust registered u/s 12AA since AY 2017-18 & holding final registration u/s 12A/12AB from AY 2022-23 to 2026-27, was engaged in charitable-cum-religious activities. It had been granted provisional approval u/s 80G(5) from 08.12.22 to AY 2025-26. Subsequently, on application in Form10AB for final approval, CIT(E) rejected the application on the ground that Assessee was a religious entity not eligible for approval u/s 80G(5) as per section 80G(5)(ii) read with Explanation 3. Simultaneously, provisional approval was also cancelled.

Before Tribunal, it was argued that the trust was charitable-cum-religious in nature, as evident from order of Registrar of Public Trusts under the Madhya Pradesh Public Trust Act, 1951 & from the order of CIT(E) itself while granting registration u/s 12AA. The trust carried out multiple social, cultural, educational & religious activities with majority being charitable in nature. Reliance was placed on section 80G(5B), which overrides section 80G(5)(ii) & provides that even if an institution incurs religious expenditure not exceeding 5% of its total income, it shall still be deemed eligible for 80G approval. It was contended that religious expenditure of the trust was limited only to minor “Poojan Expenses” & never exceeded 5% of its total income. Therefore, the rejection by CIT(E) was unjustified.

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 6,244

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.